Alonso's Surprising Defense: What Really Happened at Suzuka
Apr.8 - Fernando Alonso has defended the Suzuka circuit, amid widespread complaints about the largely action-free Japanese GP.
While the sport marvelled at Max Verstappen's performance, no one was denying that the makers of the highlight reel struggled to compile the most exciting moments.
"That's all that happened?" Oscar Piastri said in the 'cool down' room when watching the immediate highlights.
Some think the main issue was the new asphalt surface - which although producing record-breaking laptimes also meant there was minimal tyre degradation.
"Long, boring," Nico Hulkenberg said when asked to sum up his day in Japan. "It's not particularly entertaining to look at the rear wing and DRS of the car in front.
"It's just so difficult with these cars. The effect of the turbulent air gets a little worse every year."
Former Sauber team manager Beat Zehnder wasn't solely blaming the asphalt.
"We also had the hardest tyre compounds available here," he is quoted as saying by Auto Motor und Sport.
"I can imagine Pirelli will perhaps bring the softer compounds to Japan next year. And when you then see how close the field is, overtaking becomes almost impossible."
Mercedes strategists reportedly calculated that a 1.2 second pace difference was required for a successful overtake.
"It was very fast, but it was as difficult to overtake as Monaco is," said Williams' Carlos Sainz. "It's like the new Monaco but with fast corners."
F1 veteran Alonso, however, has heard it all before.
"This is Suzuka," he said. "I can't remember a race where there were too many overtaking manoeuvres here without the weather changing.
"It seems as if we always say on Thursday how great Suzuka is, how great Monaco is, the glamour, the spectacular weekend. And then we wake up on Monday and say Monaco is boring. What can we do about the track. Suzuka is boring.
"That's Formula 1," the two-time champion added.
✅ Check out more posts with related topics:
The unfortunate reality with highly aero-dependent F1 cars combined with a highly aero-dependent circuit configuration, & the same is equally true for Imola, Montmelo, Hungaroring, Zandvoort, & even Silverstone to an extent.
However, Sainz's claim about overtaking being as difficult as in Monaco is a total exaggeration because nothing will ever beat or match Monaco's overtaking difficulty.
Beat Zehnder's thought is rather pointless, not to mention already outdated since next year's tyres will be quite a bit different due to being narrower, so apples to oranges comparison.
Alonso's point is spot-on.
If you can't take boredom just get out, watch another sport, we don't need you.
I didn't mean that way, especially literally.
I can always stand boredom, heck, even last year's Monaco GP.
I was absolutely not casting aspersions on anyone other than myself dear boy
Silverstones easy to pass on , just ask Dame judith , just catapult the opposition into the wall works every time
Formula 1 races can sometimes be boring to watch, but boring is also good for scaring away the fake Formula 1 fans. Go watch Bashcar if you need "other" entertainment.
They could spice it up a bit by saying that all three tire compounds must be used in the race. Does anyone know why that's not mandatory?
✅ Checkout the latest 50 F1 Fans comments.