F1 Debate Erupts After McLaren's Controversial 1-2 Finish
Jul.22 - A milestone 1-2 victory for McLaren in Hungary ended in high controversy, after Lando Norris admits almost rejecting a repeated team order to let Oscar Piastri take the chequered flag first.
The order came because McLaren had pitted pole-sitter Norris first - even though Piastri, who after the pitstop was behind his teammate, had controlled the race from the start.
"I didn't want us to fall behind a Mercedes or Ferrari," team boss Andrea Stella explained earlier. "Like what happened to Max Verstappen."
Reactions up and down the pitlane and paddock were divided.
"Norris robbed of Hungary victory," declared Blick newspaper. "McLaren invents a problem," said the Spanish newspaper AS.
Former Red Bull driver Robert Doornbos even hit out at Norris, who earlier in the weekend had already faced criticism that he is 'too nice' to ever be champion.
"I don't know how far you get by being a gentleman," Doornbos told Ziggo Sport. "That means you're not a killer. He doesn't have that killer instinct.
"The team messes it up and then he had to clean up the mess."
Ferrari's Carlos Sainz, however, commented: "From what I've just been told, they did what had to be done.
"If they give a free undercut to your teammate, you have to give it back. It's something that, in the past, not all teams have done."
His boss Frederic Vasseur agrees: "The decision in the first place was a bit harsh on Piastri, then they took a decision that I can understand."
Before eventually giving the lead back to Piastri, Norris complained on the radio that "I'm fighting for a world championship here". Emma Kimilainen, a female racing driver, said on Viaplay: "What on earth is McLaren doing?
"Max Verstappen is 76 points ahead of Norris in the world championship, so theoretically the only driver who can beat Verstappen is Norris. Why wouldn't they maximise his points?
"Secondly, he was the faster driver," she added.
Mercedes' Toto Wolff thinks McLaren is simply re-learning on the trot how to manage difficult situations right at the front of the field in the public eye.
"Clarity in the team is important and they are learning it now," he said. "They've moved so quickly into a position where they can win with both cars that they have to stick to the rules they already have.
"Andrea is showing great leadership," Wolff added, "it's just something new."
2016 world champion Nico Rosberg commented: "It was not well managed. They are in a new situation and they are not used to dominating. But they have to get used to it, and very quickly."
Ralf Schumacher agrees: "We're talking about seven points. Let's see what they're missing at the end of the year."
From McLaren boss Stella's point of view, however, even though Norris was highly reluctant to give the place back to Piastri, he ultimately handled it perfectly.
"When you're leading the race and have such a conflict, you want to show the pace you have," he said. "That's good and that's what racing drivers do. And I want to manage racing drivers.
"So this is the car and the character of the driver that I want to see, but they also have to understand the team's demands. Lando showed both today - as a racing driver and as a team player."
✅ Check out more posts with related topics:
The lost 7 points are unlikely to make a difference to the championship outcome in the end, even if not impossible unless Max happened to win by 7-8 or fewer points, but most likely quite a bit more than 8.
I remember Ferrari and Schumacher. Always Ferrari maximised Schumi's points even when he was so far ahead just to make sure. McClaren were idiots to make Norris swap back and their lustre has taken a big hit in my book.
If Piastri deserved to win then he would've been catching Norris at the end on his better, newer tyres but he couldn't. The end is where Norris comes alive. He'd have easily caught up to Piastri and passed him in the race if they'd had pitted the right way around
This is the thing when youve no clear No 1 driver policy, it strikes me Mcl know they've realistically Zero of winning the WDC, for the WCC a different matter perhaps/maybe but doubtful and this was more for the team owners benefit, for Zak aka The Pie Man to show his employers , look how how good we are doing, as there were rumours the Arabs weren't happy with all the F**k ups recently .
Zak is an over-confident wind-bag. The engineering team obviously hit a sweet-spot, and it has nothing to do with The Pie Man.
I didn't know the Arab's have big $$ into McLaren. It would be interesting to see a graph of sponsorship $$ for each team - whose giving what.
I think its more than that , They own Mcl outright which is sad in itself