Sep.26 - Liberty Media is facing serious opposition to its plans to revive a proposal for reverse-grid qualifying sprint races for the 2021 season.

Mercedes vetoed the idea for 2020, but for 2021, a so-called 'super majority' of 28 of the 30 voting interests could wave the measure through.

So far, Mercedes and also McLaren are staunchly opposed.

"As McLaren, we have always been of the opinion that at the end of qualifying, the best drivers and the best cars should be at the front," said team boss Andreas Seidl.

He is unconvinced by the argument that Formula 1 needs to introduce some artificial excitement in order to shake up Mercedes' utter dominance.

"Mercedes deserves its successes because they did a better job than us," said the German.

Most of the drivers have also expressed their staunch opposition so far this weekend at Sochi, with Max Verstappen saying: "Formula 1 is not about an artificially created show.

"Qualifying is good as it is."

Daniil Kvyat doesn't even think the idea of the reverse grid would work.

The proposal is that the sprint race on Saturday would start in reverse championship order, with the result then determining the grid for the GP.

"After starting tenth or twelfth, the two Mercedes would be first and second after ten laps. It would just be more confusing," said Russian Kvyat.

Lando Norris added: "A reverse grid is not the key to better races. I'm relying more on the rule change coming in 2022. It's wrong to punish the best."

And Daniel Ricciardo said: "What is a grand prix victory worth if anyone can win?"


✅ Check out more posts with related topics:

6 F1 Fan comments on “F1 rejects Liberty's reverse grid plans

  1. Colin Charsley

    Regarding reverse grids, why not continue with normal qualifying, and then a coin tossed by the race director could decide normal fastest first, if the coin toss resulted in 'heads', if the result was 'tails' have a reverse grid. All drivers would go for the fastest quali , in the hope that the toss would result in a 'heads'outcome, if' tails'came up we would have really thrilling GP, why not try it?

    Reply
    • Just An Opinion

      I think a coin tossed it's just not the way to make the races better, because everyone would say that it's all just luck. In my opinion it would be more interesting to give points for qualy, for example: 10 points for the driver who is in pole, 9 for the second, 8 for the thrid... 1 for the tenth. And then on sunday, the driver who classified tenth takes the pole, the nineth takes second, eighth takes third... etc. So in this situation drivers would figth for pole beacause it gave a lot of points, but then they are going to start the race in the middle field. I think this could be very interesting and at the same time it would give very inportant points for the faster cars in qualy.

      Reply
  2. Richard G

    A coin toss?. You must be joking. All that work and money and you play heads or tails.
    Quaili is fine but I would say cars go one at a time and each go twice per segment.

    Reply

  3. ✅ Checkout the latest 50 F1 Fans comments.

What's your F1 fan opinion?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please follow our commenting guidelines.