Jul.29 - The theories are emerging about how Mercedes could have given George Russell an illegally underweight car en route to victory in Belgium.

The Briton was "heartbroken" to be disqualified after the FIA weighed and then double-checked the 1.5 kilogram underweight car an another set of scales at Spa-Francorchamps.

"We clearly made a mistake and will learn from it," said team boss Toto Wolff, who also apologised to Russell. "We now have to investigate to understand exactly what went wrong."

Team engineering boss Andrew Shovlin's early theory is that Mercedes miscalculated the weight loss from the unique winning one-stop strategy.

Auto Motor und Sport agrees: "No one had seen this strategy coming before the race. So it probably wasn't included in the weight calculations."

Russell was then not able to pick up discarded rubber after the chequered flag because the traditional 'warm-down' lap is missing in Belgium due to the Spa circuit's unusually long length.

"We will not make excuses, though," Shovlin said. "It's clearly not good enough."

Another theory, cited by Italy's La Gazzetta dello Sport, is that Mercedes' unexpected and sudden reversion to an older floor specification caused the team to miscalculate the weight effect on Russell's car.

"It is true that this happened on both cars," the newspaper explained, "but differences in setup between the two drivers may have required less ballast on Russell's car."

The silver lining for Mercedes is that Lewis Hamilton was promoted from P2 to P1, although the seven time world champion looked upset about not being offered the winning Russell-like one-stop strategy.

"Lewis said twice on the radio before the second pitstop that his tyres were good," Dutch commentator Olav Mol said on Ziggo Sport. "That was his way of saying he didn't want to stop.

"That one-stop strategy saved 20 seconds," he added.

Hamilton, who is moving to Ferrari for 2025, suggested on Viaplay that he was not very happy with the decision.

"You have to be able to trust the people you work with," he said. "So I trusted the strategy team. I told them my tyres were still good, but they brought me in anyway.

"Did I know I was running the risk of my own teammate making a one-stopper?' Hamilton asked rhetorically. "No, they didn't tell me that."


✅ Check out more posts with related topics:

5 F1 Fan comments on “Russell's Belgium DSQ: First Theories and Insights

  1. Jere Jyrälä

    He wasn't the only one-stopper & the other ones (Alonso & Tsunoda) managed to stay within the minimum requirement.

      • smokey

        As I understand it, the drivers and their cars are weighed to ensure they meet the minimum weight, and the car is required to have a certain minimum amount of fuel remaining for analysis to ensure compliance. Not so long ago a car was disqualified for not having sufficient fuel to allow analysis. I remember the incident, but don't recall the team or driver.
        Although I'm not sure if it applies only to cars and drivers finishing in points positions, or all cars and drivers.

  2. f1award

    Either way it looks like Mercedes are all but there so MV should look to be there in 25 or 26. It goes in cycles and we all knew that Mercedes would get back on top eventually.

    On another note I've read 1kg advantage is worth around .1 a second on a long lap like spa meaning GR gained around 5 seconds over the race, although I know things aren't that simple.


  3. ✅ Checkout the latest 50 F1 Fans comments.

Comments are closed.